Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Special Group Release Agreements May Be Needed For Employees 40 Years Of Age Or Older!

February, 2016
By Nancy E. Joerg, Esq.



Many of our clients decide to fire one or some of their employees from time to time and then offer severance (usually money) to the departing employees in exchange for the employees signing a release agreement. Such release agreements (commonly used across the United States) can give anxious employers a measure of comfort and certainty while at the same time voluntarily offering severance to fired employees (to tide them over during what can sometimes be a difficult transitional period to other employment). 

PURPOSE OF A RELEASE AGREEMENT: When an employer offers an employee a severance and release agreement, the employer usually wants to “be done” with the employee in terms of any problems. The employer is therefore paying severance in exchange for finality. The employer wants protection from being sued by the disgruntled employee.

“OLDER EMPLOYEES” (40 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER): When a departing employee is 40 years of age or older and the employer wants the employee to give up potential claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), the release agreement (to be legally enforceable) must meet all of the legal requirements of the federal law, the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) of 1990 (and any state laws which apply as well).

The OWBPA was enacted by Congress to make sure that “older employees” (40 and over) across the United States are not coerced by employers into giving up their rights to sue employers under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967. By incorporating the OWBPA legal requirements into a release agreement, the employer avoids having an unenforceable agreement.

GROUP TERMINATION: When release agreements are offered to two or more departing employees (for example, as part of a reduction in force), this fact pattern creates a group termination situation under which there are further legal curve balls for the employer. The employer will need to use a very special kind of "group release."

Many employers incorrectly believe that the usual release agreement they may have used frequently for situations where they have terminated one employee who is 40 years of age or older will also be sufficient for the group release situation - it isn't.

Let us compare the strict legal requirements of the two kinds of releases:

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS WHEN ONLY ONE OLDER EMPLOYEE IS BEING TERMINATED: Below are the OWBPA requirements for the single older employee being terminated (i.e., not part of a group):

  1. the release agreement between the older employee and the employer is written in a manner calculated to be clearly understood by the older employee;
  1. the release agreement specifically refers to rights or claims arising under the ADEA;
  1. the older employee is not asked to waive rights or claims that may arise after the date the release agreement is executed;
  1. the older employee waives rights or claims only in exchange for "consideration" in addition to anything of value to which the older employee already is entitled;
  1. the older employee is advised in writing to consult with an attorney prior to executing the release agreement;
  1. the older employee is given a period of at least 21 days within which to consider the release agreement; and
  1. the release agreement provides that for a period of at least 7 days following the execution of such release agreement, the older employee may revoke the release agreement, and the release agreement shall not become effective or enforceable until the 7-day revocation period has expired.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS WHEN A GROUP (I.E., TWO OR MORE EMPLOYEES) IS BEING TERMINATED: For a group release (when 2 or more employees are being terminated), the seven requirements listed above apply. However, the 21-day period to consider the release agreement is extended to a 45-day period. The employer must also attach to the group release agreement a SPECIAL DISCLOSURE FORM presenting in writing the following five elements:
  1. the class, unit or group of employees covered by the termination program
  2. the factors affecting eligibility for the termination program
  3. any time limits that apply to the termination program
  4. the job titles and ages of all employees eligible for the termination program
  5. ages and titles of employees in the same class, unit, or group who are not eligible or selected for the termination program.
Of course, like with any contract, there must be legal consideration to seal the release agreement. Consideration is something of value (usually money) passing between the employer and the departing employee such as severance. It must be severance that the employee is not already entitled to (by virtue of the employee handbook or an employment agreement). Consideration must be “above and beyond” what the employer was already required to give the departing employee.

If the release agreement is not in full compliance with the OWBPA group release requirements, a court may permit the employees under this group termination program to pursue their ADEA claims against the employer (even though the employees signed the waiver and release agreements and accepted a severance package).

The terminations do not need to be on the same day to qualify as multiple terminations or group terminations under the OWBPA. Staggered terminations that are part of the same decision-making process will count as multiple terminations.

Group terminations for older workers (those 40 years of age and older) are unusually technical. The legal requirements are very strict. Failure by an employer to meet all the legal requirements means that the employer may be giving the older workers severance for signing the group release, but, if the group release is not legally enforceable, those older workers can still bring lawsuits against the employer for age discrimination and the employer is unlikely to recoup any portion of the severance paid. 

Courts have found ADEA waivers invalid for failing to meet just one of the many statutory requirements, especially when groups of employees are involved. Examples of problems include failing to provide information concerning group members, eligibility factors, applicable program time limits, and failing to list accurately job classifications and ages of employees selected for termination.

Caution: Different states may have different laws about releases. Therefore, state laws should be carefully researched before drafting a release agreement.

Questions about terminations or releases? Call Attorney Nancy E. Joerg of Wessels Sherman's St. Charles, Illinois office: (630) 377-1554 or email her at najoerg@wesselssherman.com.

Monday, February 1, 2016

Top Five Questions Illinois Accountants Have Regarding IDES Audits

February 2016
By Nancy E. Joerg, Esq.



Because of shifting audit policies by the Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES), I am receiving an increasing number of concerned phone calls from clients and their accountants. They ask me for clarification about the best way to handle IDES audits.

These are the top five questions and my answers regarding IDES audits of Illinois companies who use independent contractors:

QUESTION #1: How much can the IDES hit our company with if we get a fraud penalty?

ANSWER TO #1: IDES fraud penalties are a whopping 60% of the “contributions owed” as a result of the IDES audit. So, if a company has an assessment of $100,000 excluding interest, the fraud penalty would be $60,000 on top of the $100,000 owed (excluding interest) as a result of the IDES auditor deciding that the independent contractors for the years being audited are misclassified.

QUESTION #2: How much is the IDES interest rate and can that be negotiated down?

ANSWER TO #2: The IDES interest rate is a terrifying 24% per year (or 2% per month). Naturally, if an IDES auditor is auditing a year that is three years back, there is going to be more interest owed on any assessment that issues from that audit (as compared to an audit of just last year for example). Interest attached to IDES audits builds up at an alarming rate.

Unfortunately, IDES auditors do not have the authority to negotiate the interest rate.

QUESTION #3: What are these follow up audits that I keep hearing about?

ANSWER TO #3: The IDES recently started auditing companies that were previously audited by the IDES in recent years. These are called follow up audits. This is a radical departure for the IDES. Until recently, the IDES only audited companies who came up in a random selection or companies that had an independent contractor apply for unemployment insurance benefits (thereby creating what the IDES calls a “controversy”).

More and more follow up audits are being done by the IDES. This is very discouraging to companies who have just weathered an IDES audit and now find out they have go through another IDES audit.

The danger of follow up audits is that 60% fraud penalties become a real issue if the IDES auditor decides the company intentionally continued to classify workers as independent contractors when it was clear from the prior audit that the workers should be classified as employees.

QUESTION #4: Is it worth protesting an IDES audit?

ANSWER TO #4: In my opinion, it is always worthwhile to protest. By timely protesting the Determination & Assessment (tax bill), the company has the opportunity for a Hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. The Administrative Law Judge is an employee of the IDES, but the Administrative Law Judge is charged with the legal responsibility of fairly evaluating the issues involved in the audit and making an independent decision. It is not unusual for the Administrative Law Judge to exercise this independence and make a decision contrary to the decision of the IDES auditor and in favor of the company.

QUESTION #5: What are Objections?

ANSWER TO #5: If the company disagrees with the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge, a letter (called Objections) can be written by the company to object to the Decision. Objections do not have to be long and complex; they are not legal briefs. Objections are simply the written reasons why the company feels the Administrative Law Judge is in error in his/her Decision. The Objections process does not require a new hearing. It is simply a letter in protest of the Administrative Law Judge’s Decision.

 Questions? Consultations on Independent Contractor Status? Call Attorney Nancy E. Joerg of Wessels Sherman’s St. Charles, Illinois office: (630) 377-1554 or email her at najoerg@wesselssherman.com.